Eljen In-Drain System
Design & Installation Manual for the State of Maine
Revised January, 2005
|
Advantages
of Eljen In-Drain Systems 1.
In-Drain leach fields are based of long term acceptance rates
(LTAR) of the bio-mat fabric and the site. 2.
Leach field areas are only 25 to 33% the size of conventional
stone and pipe systems. 3.
In-Drains provides less costly and less time consuming
replacement of failed leach systems. 4.
If a raised system is necessary, it is less costly to build
because of reduced bed size so that less off-site fill must be used
than for conventional systems. 5.
Lower costs are encountered where difficult terrain is
present in leach field area. In-Drain rows can be stepped down
slopes to reduce site fill requirements. 6.
In-Drain biofabric has over 8 times the surface area for the
primary biomat layer to form than surface area under the In-Drains. 7.
Failure of soil interface is minimized because primary biomat
layer forms inside the fabric; prefiltering and pretreatment
minimizes secondary biomat formation under the In-Drains. 8.
Effluent infiltrated into the soil beneath In-Drain modules 3
to 10 times faster because of minimal secondary biomat formation on
the soil. 9.
Aerobic action occurring at the primary biomat layer within
the In-Drains results in more rapid biodegradation of pollutants. 10.
In-Drains
provides better protection of ground water because the primary
biomat layer results in a pre-treated effluent. In-Drains provides
an environment for nitrogen removal. 11. Steady infiltration from In-Drains reduces occurrence of overload or temporary ponding on soil. This results in aerobic-anaerobic stability, removing pollutants from the effluent by biochemical action. Temporary ponding in other leach fields results in aerobic-anaerobic destabilization so that untreated pollutants move into the soil. 12.
Long term siltation that can bring about premature failure in
other leach fields is prevented by the geotextile fabric cover of the
In-Drain system. 13.
In-Drains provides greater evapotranspiration than with the
conventional stone leach or chamber leach fields. Spaced cluster
In-drain layouts allow more oxygen to reach system thus providing more
aerobic effluent decomposition. 14.
Substantially reduced bed sizes require fewer trees to be cut
down to prepare a leach field area than for conventional leach fields. Terms and Definitions Standard
In-Drains: A non-aggregate biofabric filter module for leach fields
produced by the Eljen Corporation. Standard sizes; Type B-36 “wide
48”Iong 7”high & Type HB which is a half-length unit at 36”
wide 24”long 7” high. Custom sizes and Type A units are also
available on special order. Bio-Mat fabric:
Special filter fabric within In-Drain modules upon which primary
biomat layer forms. Each 3’ x 4’ Type B in-drain has approximately
100 square feet of internal biofabric. Geotextile Cover
Fabric: Anti-siltation fabric placed over In-Drain assembly to prevent
backfill above the units from washing into modules. Solid Cuspated
Core: Rigid plastic core used to separate Bio-Matt fabric thereby
creating multiple infiltrating channels. Wire Clamps: Used
to laterally secure perforated pipe until back fill is completed. Use
is optional with carefully placed back fill. In-Drain Cluster
Design: Leach field layout which takes advantage of effluent side wall
infiltration with parallel rows of modules separated by at least 12”
of sand. Cluster designs can be stepped down on sloped sites. Serial
Distribution: In-Drain layout suited for sloping sites where multiple
rows of modules are dosed in series rather than in parallel from a
distribution box. Combination
Systems: Multiple serial distribution layouts generally fed with
equally divided effluent flow from a special distribution box or other
accurate dosing device. Flow Equalizer:
Special insert placed in end of distribution pipes at the distribution
box to minimize effects of backfilling and settling. LTAR: Long Term Acceptance
Rate STE: Septic Tank Effluent MLF: Most Limiting Factor (Seasonal high water table, and/or bedrock,
and/or restrictive horizon). Minimum Design
Flow per Bedroom: 90 gallon per day. Specific situations may suggest
the use of higher values. Maine Rules:
Subsurface WasteWater Disposal Rules, 144A CMR 241, of latest version. 1.0
Basic System Design 1.1 Design and
Installation: Design and installation of In-Drain systems shall comply
with all state and local regulations and the requirements of this
manual. 1.2 System
sizing: In-Drain systems must be sized on the basis of Table 600.1 of
the Maine Subsurface WasteWater Disposal Rules (Maine Rules). Disposal
field sizing is based on an approved credit of I sq.ft. of In-Drain
bottom area equal to 4 sq.ft. of stone bed. Use In-Drain sizing Table
#1 to determine the number of Type B units for a given design flow and
disposal field size group. The 4 to 1 credit applied for all systems,
commercial and noncommercial. The number of In-Drains required is
the same for trench or Eljen’s spaced cluster configurations. Please
refer to section 5 for additional design information on commercial
systems. Increase septic tank size by 50% and system size by 30%
when garbage disposal is used. 1.3 Trench
Configurations: Trench configurations shall provide a minimum spacing
of 6’ center to center (3 feet between units) with 6” of sand (see
section 1.7 for sand specifications) below the In-Drain and 9” of
sand around the outer edge of Type B units. Trench configurations
utilize the same number of In-Drains as clustered configurations. Most
designs utilize cluster configurations unless the site designer feels
that the site has some unusual hydraulic capacity characteristics. 1.4 Clustered
Configurations: In-Drains may be installed in a clustered
configuration with a minimum of 12” of sand (See section 1.7 for
sand specification) between rows, 9” of sand around the outer edge
of the In-Drains and 6” of sand below the In-Drain rows. 1.5 Experimental
Systems: Use of In-Drains at a higher loading rate than the stated in
Section 1.6 Depth to
seasonal Ground Water Table: Maine rules require 12”,18” or 24”
from disposal bed bottom to MLF depending on Design Class and depth to
ledge. Eljens conservative leach field design specifies a receiving
sand bed layer (level to within 1/2 inch)
directly beneath the In-Drain assembly as shown in Figures 3,4, and 5.
The bottom of the disposal area is the bottom of the In-Drain unit.
The vertical separation from the bottom of the In-Drain unit to the
MLF shall not be less than 18”. In-Drain’s low profile results in
a system finished grade comparable to or lower than conventional
disposal fields. 1.7 Sand and
Fill Specifications: a. The
first 6” directly beneath the In-Drains shall be a medium to coarse
sand, with an effective size of 0.25 to 2.0 mm, no greater than 5%
passing a #200 sieve, and no particles larger than 3/4 inch; or
materials meeting the ASTM C-33 specifications. Washed concrete sand
easily meets the above specification and is a reliable choice.
Suitability of bank run sand must be verified. b. Fill
material for raised systems shall meet the requirement of Section
804.0 of the Maine Rules. Fill must be consolidated (stabilized) in
lifts to prevent differential settling. Do not use any type compactor. 1.8 Lined
Disposal Fields: Disposal fields for very permeable shoreline sites
must comply with Chapter 16 of the Maine Rules. Place lining material
at required depth followed by a 6" sand bed as described in Section
1.7 of this manual. 1.9 Distribution
Pipe Layout: Perforated 4” diameter pipe is placed on top of
In-Drain units with holes at 5 and 7 o’clock and secured by Eljen
provided wire clamps (hoops). Pipe runs perpendicular to the In-Drains
fins and lines up with the stripe painted on the top of the units. Use
solid pipe over sand and perforated pipe only over the In-Drains.
Refer to Figure 2 for typical pipe layouts. Eljen strongly recommends
SDR 35 pipe and fittings as to assure against crushing during
backfill. Systems with excessive wheel loading require Schedule 40
depending on design specifics. 1.10
Connection to Distribution Box: Install 4”
solid pipe at a minimum 1/8” per foot slope between the end of the
In-Drains and the D-Box. Place D-Box on well compacted sand or gravel
to prevent settling and effects of frost heaving. Level gravity flow
systems may use flow equalizers or other approved equal distribution
devices. 1.11 Septic
Tank Filters: Eljen strongly recommends the use of septic tank filters
and septic tank in series or duel compartment tanks. This is a means
to prevent excess solids leaving the septic tank due to lack of owner
maintenance. 1.12 System
Venting: It is strongly recommended to vent the following systems:
Pumped systems, systems over 18” below finished grade, systems
beneath paved or any surface condition that would not allow for
surface air exchange with the system or areas subject to compaction,
such as livestock, patios, and areas with vehicle traffic. 1.13 Geotextile
Antisiltation Cover Fabric: Geotextile filter fabric, provided by
Eljen, is placed over the top and sides of In-Drain rows to prevent
long term siltation and failure. Fabric must drape slightly outward at
distribution pipe to prevent blocking holes. 1.14 Backfill
and Seeding: Place a minimum of 8” of clean backfill material per
section 804.2 of the Maine Rules plus at least 4” of cover material
per Maine Rules section 804.2.6 over the In-Drain assembly. Backfill
must be free of large rocks that would damage distribution pipe, cover
fabric or In-Drain units. All other required fill shall meet the
requirements of Section 804.2 of the Maine Rules. Topsoil should be
seeded and protected from erosion per the Maine Rules. 1.15 Optimum
Leach Field Geometries: The optimum leach field layout for systems is
I or 2 rows of Standard In-Drains running along contour lines. Cluster
geometries provide the best solution for leach systems requiring fill.
Longer narrower proportions are preferred to more square geometries,
so as to increase system hydraulic capacity. This can be particularly
important for large systems in slow percolation sites and in level
areas with high ground water table. Refer to Table 1 and Figure 1 for
several design examples. 1.16
System
Grading & Erosion Control: Grading in the leach bed area during
construction and upon completion must divert surface runoff from
buildings, parking areas and nearby sloped terrain. Grade bed area in
level systems at a minimum 3% prevent surface ponding. 1.17 Vehicular
Traffic: While not generally recommended for subsurface disposal
systems, InDrains can be used under drive and parking areas with
proper thickness and quality of fill. 2.0
Systems for Level Sites 2.1 System
Configuration: Level systems layout may employ all leach field
configurations. Bottom of systems, In-Drains and distribution pipes
are installed level at their design elevations. Flow equalizers are
recommended in non-pumped systems using distribution boxes. Non
perforated interconnecting pipes between rows of In-Drains at
midpoints (in systems over 40’ long) and at ends to form pipe loops
to insure long term system capacity. Refer to Figures 2 & 3 for
section and plan views of in-ground and raised bed designs. 2.2
In-Ground
Systems: The First 6” of material directly under and 9” beside the
In-Drains must conform to Section 1 .7a of this manual. 2.3
Raised
Systems: Fill material used in raised systems must conform to Section
1 .7a and 1 .7b of this manual. 3.0
Systems for Sloped Sites 3.1 System
Configuration: Sloping sites are best served by serial distribution
with In-Drain cluster or trench layouts. Field sizing is the same as
for level systems. A securely anchored distribution box is recommend
between the septic tank and the leach areas as an access port and for
flow velocity reduction. 3.2 Cluster Row
Spacing: Minimum spacing between adjacent rows of In-Drains is 12”
for sites with 0 to 15% slope. Sites with over 15% slope should
have minimum spacing of 24” between rows. 3.3
Distribution
piping: The distribution pipe is capped at the end of each row of
In-Drains Overflow in achieved by placing an end-capped length of
perforated pipe (minimum of 10’ or 50%of the In-Drain row length
which ever is longer) at the end of each row next to the distribution
pipe and connecting it with solid pipe to the next lower elevation row
of In-Drains as shown in the Eljen Installation Instruction sheet.
This procedure continues until the end of the last row of In-Drains.
Refer to Figure 5 for sloped field design and section detail of over
flow pipe. 3.4 Sand and
Fill Specifications: Fill material, sand bed bottom and backfill are
the same as in level systems.
4.0
Combination Systems 4.1 Dosing: Use
an appropriate dosing device to assure proper effluent distribution to
each field. If standard distribution boxes are used, anchor them
adequately on stable compacted fill or place on a concrete pad not
subject to frost heaving. The use of flow equalizers are
5.0
Commercial Systems 5.1 System
Sizing: Sizing Table #1 for Standard In-Drains apply for commercial
and noncommercial systems. Table 501.2 of the Maine Rules is used to
determine design flow for various commercial facilities. Site specific
loading conditions as well as expected maintenance levels must be
factored into final system size. 5.2 Problem
Effluents: Commercial systems for the food service industry shall
employ serviceable grease trapping to limit excess grease from the
main leach field. Eljen requires installing a grease trap filter in
the waste stream. Commercial laundry effluent can contain large
quantities of suspended solids, which will quickly clog a leach field.
Prefiltering is also required here. Other problems effluent situations
include milk product plants, service stations, slaughterhouses and
rendering plants. Contact Eljen’s Maine Distributor for additional
recommendations on designs for problem effluent and filter type. 5.3 Multiple
Tanks: Multiple septic tanks in series or compartmentalized tanks are
also recommended as a method of extending leach field life. Frequency
of pumping of septic tanks and grease traps should be consistent with
maximizing leach field life. 5.4 Ground Water
Mounding: Disposal systems can produce ground water mounding in poorly
drained sites, particularly those over 1000 GPD. Designers should
avoid square leach field geometry. Maximize the leach field perimeter
and place the short dimension of the leach field in the direction of
the subsurface water gradient. The long dimension should follow the
contour lines. Longer more narrow geometries produce the least ground
water mounding. Level sites also require longer more narrow goemetries
in order to maximize radial dispersion of effluent. 6.0
Pumped Systems 6.1 Pump to
Distribution Box: Please specify an oversized distribution box for
pumped systems. Provide velocity reduction in the D-Box with a tee or
baffle. Set D-box invert 2” higher than invert of perforated pipe
over In-Drain units. Do not use equalizers or other restriction
devices in the outlet lines of the D-box. 6.2 Dosing
Design Criteria: Use a maximum of 4 gallons per dose per Type B
In-Drain in the system. Adjust pump gallons per minute and run time to
achieve the above maximum dose. Use a minimum pump run time of one (1)
minute. Longevity of currently available effluent pumps is not
effected by shorter run times. Choose force main diameter to minimize
percentage of dose drain back. Effluent velocity in force main should
fall between approximately 3 and 5 ft/sec. Pump flow rate shall be
less than 30 G.P.M. in residential systems. Design for 5-6 doses per
day. Dosage should be 30-60 gallons per dose on a residential system. 6.3 Pressure
Distribution: Dosing with small diameter pressurized laterals is not
recommended. No system reduction is allowed. TABLE
1 MINIMUM 4 OF TYPE B IN-DRAINS REQUIRED* SIZE: 36” WIDE X 48” LONG X 7” High FOR TRENCH AND SPACED CLUSTER SYSTEMS SIZING CREDIT: 1 SQ. FT. OF IN-DRAIN =4 SQ. FT. STONE BED
Subject to Size Adjustments as Outlined in Maine Rules and Notes Below. Notes: 1. Round fractional units up to next
whole number (or ½ if using ½
Type B) See Figure 2 for sample leach field geometries. Technical
References 1.
Kropf, F., R. Laak and K.A. Healy. 1977. Equilibrium Operation
of Subsurface Absorption systems. J. Water Pollution Contr. Fed.
49(9): 2007 2.
Laak, R. 1984. In-Drain Test Civil Eng. Dept., University of
Connecticut. 3.
Laak, R. 1966. The Effects of Aerobic and Anaerobic Household
Sewage Pretreatment on Seepage Beds. Doctoral Dissertation, University
of Toronto. 4.
Laak, R. 1970. Influence of Domestic Wastewater Pretreatment on
Clogging.J. Water Pollution Contr. Fed. 42(8) Part 1,1495 to 1500 5.
Civil Eng. Dept, 1073. Wastewater Disposal Systems in Unsewered
Areas. Final Report of State of Connecticut. Grant RSA 70-22
University of Connecticut. 6.
Healy, K.A. and R. Laak. 1974. Evaluation and Design of Seepage
Fields. Env. Eng. Div., Amer. Soc. Civil Eng. 100 (EES):1133-1 146 7.
Kropf, F., K.A. Healy and R. Laak. 1975. Soil Clogging in
Subsurface Absorption Systems for Liquid Domestic Wastes. Progress in
Water Technology. Pergamon Press. 767-774 8.
Laak, R 1976. Pollutant Loads from Plumbing Fixtures and
Pretreatment to Control Soil Clogging. J. of Environmental Health. 36
(1) July-August. 9.
Tyler, E.J., R. Laak, et aI. 1977. The Soil as a Treatment
System. Proc. ASAE 2nd National Conference, Chicago, December. 10.
Laak, R 1987. On-Site Wastewater Drain Fields Using Lightweight
In-Drains. Proc. International Conf. Cold Regions Env. Eng., Edmonton,
Canada. 11.
Laak, R 1988. Using In-Drain at Soil dogging Infiltration
Surface. ASAE, Rapid City, South Dakota. 12.
Laak, R. 1988 Using In-Drain Goesynthedcs in Soil Infiltration
Systems. ASAE, International Meeting, Quebec, Canada.Pater no. 892176,
June. 13.
Amerson, R.S., E.J. Tyler and S.C Converse 1991. Infiltration
as Affected by Compaction, Fines and Contact Area of Gravel ASAE Pub.
10-91 14.
Laak, R. 1986. Wastewater Engineering Design for Unsewered
Areas, Second Edition, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.
|
![]()
220 Lewiston Road (Rt
#100)
Gray, ME 04039
In
Maine: 1-800-897-4072
Tel: 207-657-2955
Fax: 207-657-2956
wayne@indrain.com
[Home] [Installation Guide] [Design & Installation Manual] [Contact Us]
*Eljen, In-Drain and Bio-Matt are all trademarks of the Eljen Corp.
Last updated: 01/19/2007